Comments by bellesouth
Page 1 of 22 | Next
Posted on March 6 at 10:39 a.m.
Why not use Under the Hill? Paddlewheel boats have been docking there for 200 years! Then you won't have to worry about building a dock. Besides that, it has flooded twice under Roth's Hill just in the last two years. Doesn't seem logical to build anything down there.
Posted on March 3 at 11:01 a.m.
Great timing! Just when Pilgrimage starts and all the way through to when it ends. Was that on purpose, David Gardner.
Posted on March 2 at 11:09 p.m.
No Dean Wormer is correct. They tear up the streets for water repair and then make the city re-pave the streets. It's called conflict of interest for Mr. David Gardner. THAT is what it is called.
Posted on February 24 at 9:28 p.m.
Way to Go BarBour! Who cares if our children get edumicated? Screw the kids. Screw the state. ALL HAIL THE BOUR IN CHIEF! Hey and don't pay taxes, don't call the police, don 't call the firemen when your house is burning down. Let's have anarchy. Everyone load up on guns. SPEND YOUR MONEY ON GUNS AND TOBACCO, THOSE GROUPS ARE GROUPS OUR GOVERNOR LOBBIES FOR!
Posted on February 18 at 9:41 a.m.
Why anyone would build anything where it has flooded for the last two years and is expected to flood again is beyond me.
Posted on February 3 at 9:55 a.m.
I agree with fortyhills. That is an awful lot of money for some signs along sidewalks when we need that money for the drainage project. I say put a hold on this until the drainage project is finished. In fact, I believe we need an auditor to audit this 2.9 million dollars for signs along existing sidewalks.
Posted on January 29 at 10:58 a.m.
Speed bumps like those on Linton Ave. where you can't go over them over 20 mph would do the trick before the hump. Seems like an inexpensive way to handle it.
Posted on January 29 at 10:48 a.m.
Besides there are better allergy medicines than psuedo-ephedrine.
The House passed the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 as an amendment to the renewal of the USA PATRIOT Act. Signed into law by president George W. Bush on March 6, 2006, the act amended the US Code (21 USC 830) concerning the sale of ephedrine-containing products. The federal statute included the following requirements for merchants who sell these products:
A retrievable record of all purchases identifying the name and address of each party to be kept for two years
Required verification of proof of identity of all purchasers
Required protection and disclosure methods in the collection of personal information
Reports to the Attorney General of any suspicious payments or disappearances of the regulated products
Non-liquid dose form of regulated product may only be sold in unit dose blister packs
Regulated products are to be sold behind the counter or in a locked cabinet in such a way as to restrict access
Daily sales of regulated products not to exceed 3.6 grams without regard to the number of transactions
Monthly sales not to exceed 9 grams of pseudoephedrine base in regulated products
The law gives similar regulations to mail-order purchases, except the monthly sales limit is only 7.5 grams.
Page 1 of 22 | Next
Posted on March 14 at 8:02 p.m.
What I don't get is that they are all worried about this project because of its proximity to an antebellum home! It is not in the historic district. So, right across the street is an old Pik-Qik with some sorts of businesses, caddy corner is a building falling down by neglect with a hole in the side of it as big as a car, and a nice church next door. The elephant in the room is falling down by neglect building with a hole in the side of it as big as a car! And they are touting progress! What a joke.
On Preservation Commission OKs revised health center plans