Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 7 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
County reduces EDA funding
Published Wednesday, September 9, 2009
NATCHEZ — Taking corrective action for seven years of over funding the Natchez-Adams Economic Development Authority, supervisors reduced the group’s budget Tuesday by $70,000.
Adams County Supervisor Darryl Grennell said since 2002 the EDA has been receiving $275,000 a year, jointly funded by the city and county.
The legislation that governs the EDA mandates that the county contribute 60 percent of the EDA’s funding while the City of Natchez contributes the remaining 40 percent.
For the past seven years the county has funded the EDA with a $175,000 allocation while the city has matched those funds $100,000.
Grennell said based on the $275,000 request from the EDA, the county should actually be giving the group $165,000, not $175,000 as they have been for the past seven years.
Multiplying seven years of over payments times $10,000 per year, the supervisors deducted $70,000 from the EDA’s $165,000 leaving the group with $95,000 for the upcoming fiscal year.
Last week the board calculated their EDA contribution to be $150,000.
That number was based on the city’s contribution, not the EDA’s overall request.
The correct calculation was should be based on the EDA’s request, Grennell said.
EDA Chairman Woody Allen said the EDA will simply have to do its best with whatever funding the supervisors allocate.
“We just have to live with it,” Allen said. “That’s all we can do.”
But the decrease in funding makes it impossible to find a new executive director for the EDA, Allen said.
Since January, when the EDA’s director left to pursue other ventures, no new director has been hired to fill the slot since the future for the EDA’s funding has always been in question.
Allen said with a decrease in funding, it will almost impossible to fund a salary for a new director.
Grennell’s motion to adjust the EDA’s funding passed with a unanimous vote.
In other news, the board took no action on a motion offered by Supervisor Mike Lazarus that called for the board to adopt an interlocal agreement aimed at getting a referendum on the Nov. 3 ballot concerning the developing a recreation complex run by the county, city and Natchez-Adams School Board.
In recent weeks, at the behest of the supervisors, wording in the agreement was changed to help specify how the project would be funded.
While the city and school board readopted the amended resolution, the county has yet to take any action.
Supervisors’ President Henry Watts said he would like to take more time to review the amended document before voting.
“I think everyone is for it,” Watts said. “But I thought the board would have had more time to discuss it.”
But the board could vote on the matter as early as today.
At this evening’s public hearing to discuss ad valorem taxes the issue is expected to be raised again.
Tonight’s meeting begins at 5:30 p.m. in the supervisors’ boardroom.
The board also met in executive session, citing personnel issues and potential litigation, for approximately 30 minutes.





Comments
Posted by natashakubelikov (anonymous) on September 9, 2009 at 12:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Does anybody really understand the slightest thing going on on this topic? They talk it around and around.but no return on the investment ever shows up.
Posted by crazyworld (anonymous) on September 9, 2009 at 5:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Finally the supervisors showed good sense to not only correct the funding problem, but to make it retroactive for their past mistakes for 7 yrs.
Posted by gemccull (Gary McCullars) on September 9, 2009 at 7:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Just because the EDA submitted a budget for $275M does not mean that the city and county had to fund it.
If the 40% allocation for the city and 60% allocation for the county are correct, Then, the county should be have made an adjustment on $150M if the city only contributed $100M.
Otherwise, the city needs to increase their contribution for past years to get in compliance with county's contribution.
Posted by beammeupscotty (anonymous) on September 9, 2009 at 7:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I thought the rec. center being on the ballot was a done deal. On the tax issue, the county reduced the millage but we will still be paying $852,729 dollars more in property taxes.
Posted by shelockholmes (anonymous) on September 9, 2009 at 7:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Beammeup you will not be paying more, there was a million from CCA and about 500 thousand from new hotels and dembery. So they must have cut some of that, also it is my understanding some people's taxes will go up because they were undervalued for so long. Mr Atkins can say what he wants the state just made him do his job. If the assessments
had been kept up there would be no suprises.
Posted by beammeupscotty (anonymous) on September 9, 2009 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
sherlock, I will be paying more and so will most people. Not because assessments weren't being kept up but because they devised a new method of assessment. Atkins did what he was told . I still have doubts that it was done without giving some breaks to certain owners. The reason I say I'll be paying more is because I went to the tax office and asked.
Posted by natashakubelikov (anonymous) on September 9, 2009 at 10:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You can betcha the old money landowners got the breaks,like in the club uptown.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)