Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 7 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Maybe county needs more sheriffs
Published Friday, October 16, 2009
It’s worthy coverage that The Democrat had a 4-day autobiographical series on the candidates for sheriff.
As an elder dependent on Natchez Transit, I was unable to attend the evening forum held at the Convention Center. I’ve heard that more than 300 attended; people, recognizing the importance of leadership for the safety and sanctity of this city/county. We note how the crime reports are stretching, to occupy more space. Besides, there’s murder intensity on the front page.
Beyond all we read, there’s the silent and hidden: the wives with their colorful bruising, the children crying into their pillows, muffled from exposure, the man who doesn’t know what to do when there’s no funding for his addictions, or simply spareribs for supper.
I too, falsely thought, I resided in a safe location. I live near Duncan Park. Two Saturdays ago, my neighbor of four houses away, was weeding the beauty the couple had created in retirement bliss. It was mid-day. A car stopped for directions, then labor, then money? The neighbor said he didn’t have money. Maybe he didn’t. It was the end of month. Besides, he has the right to tend his own.
Fortunately, he elbowed the attacker away, thus, only needed 15 stitches to his chin, rather than throat or heart. An hour later, on Madison Street, a man was beaten to death by a plank.
I listened to the candidates on radio. They gave good platforms.
The problem was the moderator kept reversing speaker’s directions. Sometimes, one way, then backwards; then from the middle. I understand that this was protective of the candidates; that they not pilfer best words from one another. Fine, if one can see them.
But for a listener, it became a carousel of confusion. Clifford Cox was the clearest to saying his name. Even he surrendered name midway; realizing that message, during time limitation, was the objective.
Who am I to vote for? I don’t know yet. Still, I realize the weight of a single vote.
When I listened to the candidates, truthfully, I liked them all. One was missing. I probably would have liked him, too, for he was a man sacrificing appearance for supportive family values.
I liked Chuck Mayfield’s years with Youth Court. It showed he’d understand incipient situations before they led to imprisonment, or suicide, of our youth. This clash of cultures will grow. We need Natchez to set a safe example.
I liked Greg Wisner’s personality. He has a tinge of humor, and humor is said to diffuse bad situations.
I liked Craig Godbold because I think Natchez should again have a K-9 dog for both security, rescue and teaching in the schools.
In final words, it was more as if a full “posse” of these men was needed for many talents, their education and experiences. Perhaps Natchez needs more men in leadership roles in the sheriff’s office. And fewer men leading the city.
Corinne M. O’Begley
Natchez resident





Comments
Posted by Yeahuhuh (anonymous) on October 16, 2009 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think Corrine's view on what is important in a sheriff is accurate.
Likely as not, the new sheriff with be cooperating with the rest of these fellows as his primary role and giving some heart and wisdom to the post. I do think Chuck appears to have a steady hand and significant experience.
Lucky for us, the losing candidates will still likely be in law enforcement and doing what they already do.
Posted by ntz143 (anonymous) on October 16, 2009 at 10:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I too live in the neighborhood Mrs. Begley resides in. The attck she described happened at 2:00 on a SATURDAY AFTERNOON! The man was working in his yard and was attacked by a knife-wielding thug. I thought my neighborhood was safe but the reality is, there is nowhere safe. Think hard about the kind of person you want for sheriff....their job is only going to get increasingly more difficult. It will take a cool head, firmness, and innovative prevention to change the crime wave we are now experiencing.
Posted by Realistic1 (anonymous) on October 16, 2009 at 10:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think we need a proactive sheriff that will be out on the streets with his deputies. Cliff Cox is that guy. He is young enough to still be active on the streets, He has the Education and the Experience to run the department. He has endorsements from two other majors at the Sheriff department. Cox had Brown's trust or he wouldn't have been a major and the commander of the narcotics unit....Cliff Cox for Sheriff.....He is a proven leader......
Posted by TheThinker (anonymous) on October 17, 2009 at 3:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Chuck Mayfield!
Posted by mrconcernedcitizen (anonymous) on October 17, 2009 at 8:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Anybody BUT cox for sheriff !
Posted by natchezroots1 (anonymous) on October 17, 2009 at 9:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sounds as if you had a run in with Mr. cox mrconcernedcitizen or maybe you are an opposed candidate. Regardless facts remain Cox is the most qualified candidate and I believe he will be our next Sheriff. Vote Cliff Cox for Sheriff because qualifications matter.
Posted by OldGrandDad (anonymous) on October 17, 2009 at 3:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am amazed at how many new people have recently signed up to post here and their only community concern is to see Mr. Cox elected. It almost smells like a concerted family affair. Perhaps everyone sat down at the dinner table and agreed that each person would sign up as 3 different posters? Personally, and with all due respect to Mr. Cox and all the other candidates, Almost every person I meet is supporting Chuck Mayfield. I think certain other candidates should cut their losses and drop out now. Throwing good money after bad ain't good bizness.
:)
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)