Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 5 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

Most of Miss. budget approved; public safety iffy

Published Tuesday, June 30, 2009

JACKSON (AP) — Bleary-eyed Mississippi lawmakers engaged in a marathon, up-to-midnight session Tuesday as they struggled to finish a $6 billion state budget before the new fiscal year started.

The House and Senate reauthorized Medicaid to stay in business with the start of the year Wednesday, and both chambers passed a separate bill to fund the government health insurance program for the needy. Medicaid covers about one in every four Mississippians, and health advocates feared it would lapse out of existence.

‘‘It’s been a long, drawn-out process and people’s nerves have been on edge,’’ said Mary Troupe, executive director of the Mississippi Coalition for Citizens with Disabilities, said late Tuesday. ‘‘It’s not a game. This can be life or death for people.’’

As a midnight deadline approached, spending plans for the Department of Public Safety and the Public Service Commission were unresolved.

Gov. Haley Barbour signed a long list of budget bills for most state agencies.

Legislators have to vote every few years to keep state agencies in business — a process that gives officials a chance to review whether programs are operating efficiently. The Medicaid reauthorization bill passed the House on Tuesday night only after a long delay.

Democratic Rep. George Flaggs of Vicksburg was upset about managed-care provisions he thought would limit patients’ medical options, and he exercised his right to have the 82-page bill read aloud.

‘‘This bill is not going to leave here killing people,’’ Flaggs said to the groans of some colleagues.

It took several House staff members two hours, 20 minutes to read the bill aloud. Only after that did the bill go to the Senate.

The governor controls the agenda of any special session, and he waited until Tuesday to let lawmakers consider Medicaid. He did so only after the Mississippi Hospital Association conceded in a hard-knuckled political fight over the governor’s plan to tax hospitals to help fund Medicaid.

Barbour said the hospital tax starts at $60 million a year and gradually increases to $90 million over the next couple of years, as federal stimulus money disappears.

Hundreds of legislators, lobbyists and spectators gathered in the Capitol rotunda Tuesday to watch as Sam Cameron, executive director of the Mississippi Hospital Association, held a news conference to grudgingly call on the House and Senate to pass the hospital tax, an issue that held up the entire state budget for months.

As Barbour watched from a balcony above, Cameron said he was not going to ‘‘respond to the governor’s threats’’ about the tax.

‘‘I want to warn everyone that there are hospitals who cannot afford to pay the tax provisions in this bill,’’ Cameron said. ‘‘I want to warn everyone that service and staff reductions in local hospitals may occur as a result of this bill.’’

Barbour told reporters moments later that under the deal, hospitals will pay their ‘‘fair share’’ to help the state collect federal money for Medicaid. Hospitals had paid a similar tax for about a dozen years until the federal government blocked it in 2005. Barbour has tried since then to persuade lawmakers to pass a revised hospital tax.

‘‘I have said from the beginning, no bill is better than a bad bill, that any Medicaid bill that did not protect the taxpayers was worse than no bill. And if they take it as a threat that I was not going to sign a bad bill for the taxpayers, then that’s his interpretation,’’ Barbour said, responding to Cameron.

Mississippi lawmakers started their special session on Sunday. The budget is usually finished by early April, but legislators delayed their final decisions this year to give themselves more time to study how the federal stimulus package will affect state government.

Witnesses said Barbour angrily confronted House Democratic leaders in a Capitol hallway Tuesday about a House attempt to extend, for one more year, a cap on salaries for the governor’s staff. Senators had voted to remove the cap.

Rep. Cecil Brown, D-Jackson, said Barbour was ‘‘very upset.’’ Brown said the House wants to leave the salary cap on the governor’s staff because of the tight economy. He said other agencies face similar restrictions.

Shortly before midnight, the House removed the salary cap — a step that led to final approval of the governor’s office budget.

———

The bills are House Bills 71 and 54.

Comments

Posted by jrn59 (anonymous) on July 2, 2009 at 6:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Why in the world doesn't Ms. legislators and Ms. governor review and analyze just who the recipients are that remain on Medicaid. WE DO NOT need to be paying for these babies to be born and then we, the tax payer funds their entire education. Remember next election, lets roll 'em out of office. People our local hospitals are going to close, for what? Medicaid.....

Posted by freedom42 (anonymous) on July 2, 2009 at 8:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

How can something like "Public Safety" be iffy?

Posted by rushinghjr (anonymous) on July 2, 2009 at 3:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Very good comments! Keep the Good Voices Loud!

Posted by jrn59 (anonymous) on July 2, 2009 at 7:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

It passed! Gov. says Medicaid provides health care for about 600,000 elderly, disabled and poor pregnant women and children. See why our state is so poor! Gov. said he wanted this tax increase on our hospitals cause it will be a permanent solution to Medicaid's woes. His permanent solution expires less than a year after HE leaves office. Does any one know how much money the hospitals receive from Medicaid for taking care of these patients??

Posted by EnKiKur (Marty Ellerbe) on July 3, 2009 at 11:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

From an earlier speech by Barbour, on the hospital tax:

"The hospitals and nursing homes actually asked the Legislature for these taxes, and have paid the taxes gladly. The reason is, they get a huge return for their money. In the case of the hospital tax at issue now, the hospitals get back six dollars for every dollar they pay in." http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article...

Who is going to pay this tax? The hospitals, or the paying patients? Who do you think?

That was some hard-nosed fight the hospital association put up.

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


advanced search

Try these other Natchez Newspaper Web sites: Natchez on the River and Natchez Scene

© 2009, Natchez Newspapers, Inc.

Contact us