Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 4 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Jury debates Doty Road Center
Published Tuesday, June 23, 2009
VIDALIA — The Concordia Parish Police Jury voted Monday to give itself 30 days to figure out what to do with the Doty Road Center.
In a unanimous vote, the jurors decided to contact the landowners and the lease holders for the property the center sits on and, if they can negotiate a long-term lease or land donation, form a long-term plan for the center.
The jury owns the building but not the land it sits on, and most of the jurors expressed an interest in getting rid of the Doty Road Center.
If the jury is able to negotiate the long-term lease or get a land donation, President Melvin Ferrington said the Concordia Parish Sheriff’s Office has expressed interest in permanently taking over the property.
The sheriff’s office at one time had a lease on the building, and though the lease has expired, the sheriff’s office has continued to occupy a portion of the center as a sheriff’s substation.
Since then, the jury has paid for the maintenance of the building, and the sheriff’s office has paid for the utilities.
Complicating the matter is the fact that a now-inactive corporation holds the lease for the land. Ferrington said some of the members of the corporation have died, but others are living, leaving the potential for the corporation to reactivate.
The Veteran’s Affairs office is located in the center, as well as tutoring and summer feeding programs.
The police jury has not had a say in what has gone on in the building since the sheriff’s office’s lease expired, Ferrington said.
“The sheriff’s office does not have insurance on the building, so the insurance is on the police jury,” Ferrington said. “But any lawsuit against it would probably be against both the sheriff and the police jury.”
Juror Jimmy Jernigan responded to that with a simple solution: get rid of the building and any jury connections to the property.
But Juror Willie Dunbar responded with the crux of the problem.
“You can’t get rid of something you don’t own,” Dunbar said.
“We are going around in circles here.”
In other news:
• The jury voted to advertise for a public hearing about abandoning 100 feet of Mill Road in Wildsville.
• The jury voted to send a letter to the Department of Transportation and Development to see if it will do anything to keep a portion of Louisiana 569 in danger of washing out from doing just that.
• The jury discussed the pickup of limbs in the parish garbage contract.
“I know it is hard for the guys to pick up limbs,” Dunbar said.
“Right now we have got a lot of people complaining that they will stack the limbs in the ditch for them to be picked up, but they’re not.”
The garbage contract specifies that limb pickup will be done following any disaster, but Ferrington said the contract also specifies that the limbs must be cut into 4-foot sections first.
Any professional tree-trimmers who do work are required to haul the limbs away themselves.
The parish is looking to buy a knuckle-boom truck that can be used to haul away limbs, Jernigan said.
If that is the case, the parish will need to look into rewriting the disposal contract, Juror Joe Parker said.
If the parish is to take up the business of limb removal, it will first have to get a permanent permit from the Department of Environmental Quality for the limb disposal, Ferrington said.
The parish had a temporary disposal permit following Hurricane Gustav, but it has expired.





Comments
Posted by Lily_Dream (anonymous) on June 23, 2009 at 1:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It seems that the Jurors forgot, or shall I say neglected to mention that they occassionally lease the building out and receive profit from it. I have attended several church gatherings at that building, 2 separate family reunions, as well as repast ceremonies. The purpose was due in large because the Doty Road Center has the necessary space and amenities available. Why get rid of a building that serves the community, as well as put revenue into the purse of the police jury? Give the community the opportunity for input? Afterall, how can you decide whats good for the community without hearing from the community? Certainly another police station is not the best choice. Ferriday Police Department is already 1 mile up the road, why bring in the Sheriff's?
Posted by fonkeytowngirl (anonymous) on June 23, 2009 at 11:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lily that is so true. That building is being put to good use and who in their right mind would want to close the doors to it or just say forget about it and all the good that it serves. This building not only hosts church gatherings, family reunions and repast ceremonies but it also hosts children parties, bridal showers, wedding receptions, baby showers, club/organization meetings, banquets and the list goes on and on. So I agree that the community and especially those that live on the Doty Road be allowed to come and voice their opinion on the matter. This is why Ferriday is suffering so bad. When we have any little good thing going for us, leave it to those that we vote into office to take it from us! It is so sad that they would want to do this but then they go on the other side of town and want to take old buildings that needs thousands and thousands of dollars in repairs and try to rehabilitate them for use. That's just outright crazy!! Right now I think some of those that don't visit the building at all don't care what happens to it. Why don't some of you that are trying to close this building down, take 5 minutes out of your "busy schedules" and go on the Doty Road during the day and see just how many kids go there for lunch or during the school year and see how many kids go there for tutoring. This building is serving a good purpose for this community so I think that the idea of closing the doors is just ridiculous!!
Posted by dmackZuluking (anonymous) on June 23, 2009 at 7:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The sad thing about this story: Why was there a debate ? What are the terms with the current contract ? They don't own the land, seems to be the only problem with the Jury. Because it's possible that the company donated use of the land without cost as long as the center was used in good faith for the community. The kids that visit the center have respect for the sheriff sub-station with-in the center because the officers respect them with love and education. Making it a sheriff jail takes the image of freedom and fun away from them while the sheriff makes money off of folks misery.
Posted by fonkeytowngirl (anonymous) on June 24, 2009 at 11:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
dmack I agree with your statement. And the donation for use could very well be the case here if they took the time to do some research. You want to let a building that services your company go only because you don't own the land that it sits on? Get real!! There's more to it than that.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)