Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 3 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

Commission cracks down on monthly meeting attendance

Published Thursday, July 9, 2009

NATCHEZ — After upsetting a local developer and wasting his money by not having a quorum, the Natchez Preservation Commission is ready to make some changes.

In April, a developer paid $1,000 for his architect to fly in from Tennessee to answer any questions asked by the commission.

But without a quorum, the meeting could not take place.

Preservation commission Chair Marty Seibert used this story to introduce why, from now on, commissioner attendance will be thoroughly documented.

If a commissioner misses three consecutive meetings, the board can decide whether to replace that commissioner, Seibert said.

Another genesis for the attendance documentation presented itself in the case of former commissioner Fred Middleton.

Middleton resigned from the board in February, but the commission members didn’t catch on until June.

Lately, the commission has been scrounging to form a quorum at each meeting.

At the start of several recent meetings, commissioners have had to call their absent counterparts to attend before the meeting could start.

Commissioner Shirley Petkovsek suggested that if any commissioner cannot attend a meeting, they should inform the planning department ahead of time.

Seibert agreed that would be common courtesy.

The nine-member board has been reduced to only seven members after Middleton resigned and Sara Garcia moved out of town.

Seibert said she has requested to Mayor Jake Middleton that he and the board replace the two members. She has not yet heard back from the mayor.

In other news, the commission gave Betty Shannon approval to demolish the dilapidated front façade of a house at 109 St. Charles Ave.

Shannon plans to board up the front of the home with similar material to the rest of the home and use it for storage.

The commission said since the house will not have a door or windows, tall foliage should be planted in front of the house to camouflage its appearance.

Comments

Posted by LOVESNATCHEZ (anonymous) on July 9, 2009 at 7:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Maybe it's time for this commission to be ELECTED AND NOT APPOINTED!!!

Posted by freedom42 (anonymous) on July 9, 2009 at 12:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Well if the members of the commission don't even care enough to attend their meetings, why should the people of Natchez care about preservation either? I think I'm going to paint my house bright neon yellow!

Posted by LOVESNATCHEZ (anonymous) on July 9, 2009 at 1 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I'm just about with you "freedom". They make us jump through hoops to "allow" us to do anything but if something better comes along, they just don't show up. I think they should have to reimburse the man his $1000.00 due to their negligence.
I'm about to paint my building and trust me, I'm not asking anybody. What are they going to do? Make me strip it off????LMAO..

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


advanced search

Try these other Natchez Newspaper Web sites: Natchez on the River and Natchez Scene

© 2009, Natchez Newspapers, Inc.

Contact us